2026 current teams

Head-to-Head

Compare how two FBS teams are performing right now. For program history, use Team vs. Team.

Program History Comparison
VS.
Showing the latest available data.
Akron logo

Akron

1–6 · Unranked

VS.
Massachusetts logo

Massachusetts

4–3 · Unranked

CFB Intel Model · Neutral Field

Massachusetts by 10.8

Akron · 14%Massachusetts · 86%

Projected Akron 19 – Massachusetts 30. Expected total 49.7 points. No home-field adjustment.

At Akron: 20% for Akron · At Massachusetts: 91% for Massachusetts.

MetricAkronMassachusetts
Current record1–64–3
Conference record0–31–3
AP Top 25 rank——
FPI-22.1-13.8
FPI rank#134#118
Points per game19.026.5
Total yards per game339.6339.1
Passing yards per game206.9179.0
Rushing yards per game132.7160.1
Yards per play——
Points allowed per game32.821.1
Total yards allowed per game——
Passing yards allowed per game——
Rushing yards allowed per game——
Yards allowed per play——
Turnover margin——
Third-down %——
Red-zone %——
Sacks4.015.0
Tackles for loss23.026.0
Current-Season RésuméAkronMassachusetts
Overall Record1–64–3
Conference Record0–31–3
Strength of Record#135#116
Strength of Schedule#94#138
Remaining SOS#124#117
Game Control#132#105
Second-order wins——
Wins vs expected——
Average Win ProbabilityNot currently available——

Résumé data through Week 7 · Matches Stats & Info · View full Résumé →

How this is calculated

CFB Intel combines opponent-adjusted team strength, unit efficiency, current performance, and special teams. Ratings represent neutral-field strength. Home-field advantage is applied separately; missing inputs are excluded and the available group weights are renormalized. CFB_INTEL_MODEL_2026_V1.

Records, rankings, FPI, games, and team statistics: CollegeFootballData.