Team Strength50% base
100.0Conference Power · #1
SEC
16 FBS programs · current performance and cross-conference results.
Power Rating91.0
Average FPI14.8
Median FPI13.5
FBS Nonconference28–2
What drives the rating
Conference Power
FBS Nonconference30% effective
93.3Ranked Teams10%
62.5Opponent Quality10%
67.8SP+ ratings · 16 FBS members
Unit strength
Average team ratings for each phase of the game.
Offense 33.6Defense 20.1Special teams 0.2
Explore national ratings →FBS opponents only
Record vs. other conferences
| Opponent conference | Record | Win % |
|---|---|---|
| ACC | 5–0 | 100.0% |
| American Athletic | 5–0 | 100.0% |
| Big 12 | 3–1 | 75.0% |
| Big Ten | 2–1 | 66.7% |
| Conference USA | 4–0 | 100.0% |
| Mid-American | 1–0 | 100.0% |
| Mountain West | 2–0 | 100.0% |
| Pac-12 | 1–0 | 100.0% |
| Sun Belt | 5–0 | 100.0% |
Member strength
SEC teams
 Georgia | 6–1 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #2 | 26.7 | #3 |
 Alabama | 5–2 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #9 | 24.2 | #6 |
 Texas | 4–2 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #10 | 23.6 | #7 |
 LSU | 5–2 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #15 | 23.0 | #8 |
 Ole Miss | 5–1 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #12 | 18.8 | #11 |
 Tennessee | 6–1 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #16 | 18.1 | #12 |
 Florida | 5–2 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #25 | 14.3 | #19 |
 Texas A&M | 4–3 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 13.5 | #20 |
 Auburn | 4–2 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 13.4 | #21 |
 Oklahoma | 3–3 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 13.3 | #22 |
 Kentucky | 6–1 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #8 | 12.7 | #26 |
 Missouri | 5–2 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #19 | 12.3 | #27 |
 South Carolina | 3–3 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #23 | 11.6 | #29 |
 Mississippi State | 4–2 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 9.1 | #38 |
 Arkansas | 3–4 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 2.2 | #58 |
 Vanderbilt | 3–4 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 0.5 | #66 |
Methodology
Only completed FBS-vs-FBS nonconference games count. Early-season result weight scales from zero to 30% across the first 10 games, with unused weight assigned to current team strength. Ranked-team share and opponent quality use the latest verified data.