Team Strength50% base
0.0Conference Power · #10
Mid-American
13 FBS programs · current performance and cross-conference results.
Power Rating9.6
Average FPI-15.1
Median FPI-14.3
FBS Nonconference7–29
What drives the rating
Conference Power
FBS Nonconference30% effective
19.4Ranked Teams10%
0.0Opponent Quality10%
37.9SP+ ratings · 13 FBS members
Unit strength
Average team ratings for each phase of the game.
Offense 17.4Defense 31.2Special teams -0.2
Explore national ratings →FBS opponents only
Record vs. other conferences
| Opponent conference | Record | Win % |
|---|---|---|
| ACC | 0–3 | 0.0% |
| American Athletic | 2–2 | 50.0% |
| Big 12 | 0–2 | 0.0% |
| Big Ten | 1–11 | 8.3% |
| Conference USA | 1–2 | 33.3% |
| Mountain West | 1–4 | 20.0% |
| Pac-12 | 1–2 | 33.3% |
| SEC | 0–1 | 0.0% |
| Sun Belt | 0–1 | 0.0% |
Member strength
Mid-American teams
 Western Michigan | 5–2 | 3–0 | 100.0% | — | -2.5 | #81 |
 Toledo | 5–2 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | -3.4 | #84 |
 Ohio | 5–2 | 3–0 | 100.0% | — | -7.1 | #95 |
 Miami (OH) | 4–3 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | -9.8 | #106 |
 Buffalo | 4–3 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | -12.9 | #114 |
 Massachusetts | 4–3 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | -13.8 | #118 |
 Central Michigan | 3–4 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | -14.3 | #121 |
 Eastern Michigan | 4–4 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | -16.7 | #128 |
 Bowling Green | 2–5 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | -17.7 | #129 |
 Ball State | 2–5 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | -21.1 | #132 |
 Akron | 1–6 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | -22.1 | #134 |
 Kent State | 2–5 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | -22.3 | #135 |
 Sacramento State | 1–6 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | -32.4 | #138 |
Methodology
Only completed FBS-vs-FBS nonconference games count. Early-season result weight scales from zero to 30% across the first 10 games, with unused weight assigned to current team strength. Ranked-team share and opponent quality use the latest verified data.