Team Strength50% base
0.0Conference Power · #11
Mid-American
13 FBS programs · current performance and cross-conference results.
Power Rating9.3
Average FPI-15.0
Median FPI-16.6
FBS Nonconference5–22
What drives the rating
Conference Power
FBS Nonconference30% effective
18.5Ranked Teams10%
0.0Opponent Quality10%
37.3FBS opponents only
Record vs. other conferences
| Opponent conference | Record | Win % |
|---|---|---|
| ACC | 0–2 | 0.0% |
| American Athletic | 2–0 | 100.0% |
| Big 12 | 0–2 | 0.0% |
| Big Ten | 1–10 | 9.1% |
| Conference USA | 1–2 | 33.3% |
| Mountain West | 1–3 | 25.0% |
| Pac-12 | 0–1 | 0.0% |
| SEC | 0–1 | 0.0% |
| Sun Belt | 0–1 | 0.0% |
Member strength
Mid-American teams
| Team | Record | Conference | Poll | FPI | FPI rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 Western Michigan | 2–1 | 0–0 | — | -0.0 | #66 |
 Toledo | 2–1 | 0–0 | — | -1.8 | #77 |
 Miami (OH) | 1–2 | 0–0 | — | -8.4 | #104 |
 Ohio | 1–2 | 0–0 | — | -10.2 | #112 |
 Massachusetts | 3–0 | 0–0 | — | -11.4 | #116 |
 Central Michigan | 2–1 | 0–0 | — | -16.2 | #127 |
 Buffalo | 1–2 | 0–0 | — | -16.6 | #128 |
 Akron | 1–2 | 0–0 | — | -17.9 | #130 |
 Eastern Michigan | 1–3 | 1–0 | — | -19.3 | #132 |
 Ball State | 1–2 | 0–0 | — | -21.6 | #134 |
 Bowling Green | 0–3 | 0–0 | — | -23.2 | #136 |
 Kent State | 1–2 | 0–0 | — | -23.2 | #137 |
 Sacramento State | 1–3 | 0–1 | — | -25.1 | #138 |
Methodology
Only completed FBS-vs-FBS nonconference games count. Early-season result weight scales from zero to 30% across the first 10 games, with unused weight assigned to current team strength. Ranked-team share and opponent quality use the latest verified data.