Team Strength50% base
77.8Conference Power · #3
Big 12
16 FBS programs · current performance and cross-conference results.
Power Rating70.6
Average FPI8.2
Median FPI8.1
FBS Nonconference24–8
What drives the rating
Conference Power
FBS Nonconference30% effective
75.0Ranked Teams10%
31.3Opponent Quality10%
61.0SP+ ratings · 16 FBS members
Unit strength
Average team ratings for each phase of the game.
Offense 31.4Defense 21.3Special teams 0.1
Explore national ratings →FBS opponents only
Record vs. other conferences
| Opponent conference | Record | Win % |
|---|---|---|
| ACC | 3–2 | 60.0% |
| American Athletic | 1–1 | 50.0% |
| Big Ten | 1–2 | 33.3% |
| Conference USA | 2–0 | 100.0% |
| Mid-American | 2–0 | 100.0% |
| Mountain West | 2–0 | 100.0% |
| Pac-12 | 6–0 | 100.0% |
| SEC | 1–3 | 25.0% |
| Sun Belt | 5–0 | 100.0% |
Member strength
Big 12 teams
 Texas Tech | 6–0 | 3–0 | 100.0% | #13 | 19.4 | #9 |
 Utah | 6–0 | 3–0 | 100.0% | #3 | 17.4 | #13 |
 BYU | 6–0 | 3–0 | 100.0% | #7 | 17.4 | #14 |
 Houston | 6–1 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #17 | 14.8 | #18 |
 Arizona | 5–1 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #24 | 10.5 | #33 |
 Baylor | 4–2 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 10.0 | #34 |
 Oklahoma State | 4–2 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 9.0 | #40 |
 TCU | 3–3 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 8.6 | #42 |
 Kansas State | 4–2 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 7.6 | #45 |
 UCF | 3–3 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 5.2 | #51 |
 Iowa State | 3–3 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 4.3 | #54 |
 Kansas | 2–4 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 3.7 | #55 |
 Cincinnati | 4–2 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 3.5 | #56 |
 Colorado | 2–4 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1.0 | #63 |
 West Virginia | 4–3 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 0.4 | #67 |
 Arizona State | 3–3 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | -1.3 | #75 |
Methodology
Only completed FBS-vs-FBS nonconference games count. Early-season result weight scales from zero to 30% across the first 10 games, with unused weight assigned to current team strength. Ranked-team share and opponent quality use the latest verified data.