Team Strength50% base
40.0Conference Power · #7
American Athletic
14 FBS programs · current performance and cross-conference results.
Power Rating36.4
Average FPI-5.4
Median FPI-3.6
FBS Nonconference11–17
What drives the rating
Conference Power
FBS Nonconference30% effective
39.3Ranked Teams10%
0.0Opponent Quality10%
46.5FBS opponents only
Record vs. other conferences
| Opponent conference | Record | Win % |
|---|---|---|
| ACC | 0–1 | 0.0% |
| Big 12 | 1–1 | 50.0% |
| Big Ten | 0–3 | 0.0% |
| Conference USA | 3–0 | 100.0% |
| FBS Independents | 0–1 | 0.0% |
| Mid-American | 0–2 | 0.0% |
| Mountain West | 2–0 | 100.0% |
| Pac-12 | 1–2 | 33.3% |
| SEC | 0–4 | 0.0% |
| Sun Belt | 4–3 | 57.1% |
Member strength
American Athletic teams
| Team | Record | Conference | Poll | FPI | FPI rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 South Florida | 3–0 | 1–0 | — | 0.8 | #63 |
 Tulane | 1–2 | 0–0 | — | -0.2 | #68 |
 Memphis | 3–1 | 0–0 | — | -0.8 | #71 |
 Tulsa | 3–0 | 0–0 | — | -1.0 | #72 |
 UTSA | 2–1 | 0–0 | — | -1.7 | #76 |
 North Texas | 1–2 | 0–0 | — | -2.3 | #79 |
 Army | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | -2.7 | #80 |
 East Carolina | 1–2 | 0–0 | — | -4.6 | #84 |
 Temple | 1–2 | 0–0 | — | -4.6 | #85 |
 Navy | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | -5.3 | #88 |
 Florida Atlantic | 2–1 | 1–0 | — | -10.4 | #113 |
 Rice | 1–2 | 0–0 | — | -13.5 | #122 |
 UAB | 1–2 | 0–0 | — | -14.9 | #125 |
 Charlotte | 0–3 | 0–0 | — | -15.0 | #126 |
Methodology
Only completed FBS-vs-FBS nonconference games count. Early-season result weight scales from zero to 30% across the first 10 games, with unused weight assigned to current team strength. Ranked-team share and opponent quality use the latest verified data.