Team Strength50% base
44.4Conference Power · #6
American Athletic
14 FBS programs · current performance and cross-conference results.
Power Rating38.6
Average FPI-6.1
Median FPI-4.5
FBS Nonconference16–24
What drives the rating
Conference Power
FBS Nonconference30% effective
40.0Ranked Teams10%
0.0Opponent Quality10%
43.8SP+ ratings · 14 FBS members
Unit strength
Average team ratings for each phase of the game.
Offense 24.3Defense 29.2Special teams 0.0
Explore national ratings →FBS opponents only
Record vs. other conferences
| Opponent conference | Record | Win % |
|---|---|---|
| ACC | 0–1 | 0.0% |
| Big 12 | 1–1 | 50.0% |
| Big Ten | 0–3 | 0.0% |
| Conference USA | 3–0 | 100.0% |
| Mid-American | 2–2 | 50.0% |
| Mountain West | 2–1 | 66.7% |
| Pac-12 | 2–3 | 40.0% |
| SEC | 0–5 | 0.0% |
| Sun Belt | 6–5 | 54.5% |
Member strength
American Athletic teams
 Memphis | 5–2 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 3.0 | #57 |
 North Texas | 4–2 | 2–0 | 100.0% | — | 2.1 | #59 |
 Army | 4–2 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | -0.0 | #69 |
 Tulane | 3–3 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | -1.2 | #74 |
 UTSA | 6–1 | 3–0 | 100.0% | — | -1.9 | #77 |
 South Florida | 5–2 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | -2.2 | #80 |
 Tulsa | 4–3 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | -3.7 | #86 |
 East Carolina | 3–3 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | -5.2 | #90 |
 Navy | 2–4 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | -5.5 | #91 |
 Temple | 2–5 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | -9.3 | #104 |
 Florida Atlantic | 4–2 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | -10.1 | #107 |
 UAB | 4–3 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | -13.8 | #117 |
 Rice | 1–6 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | -15.4 | #124 |
 Charlotte | 1–6 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | -21.9 | #133 |
Methodology
Only completed FBS-vs-FBS nonconference games count. Early-season result weight scales from zero to 30% across the first 10 games, with unused weight assigned to current team strength. Ranked-team share and opponent quality use the latest verified data.