Team Strength50% base
66.7Conference Power · #4
ACC
17 FBS programs · current performance and cross-conference results.
Power Rating58.0
Average FPI6.1
Median FPI6.6
FBS Nonconference18–12
What drives the rating
Conference Power
FBS Nonconference30% effective
60.0Ranked Teams10%
11.8Opponent Quality10%
55.0SP+ ratings · 17 FBS members
Unit strength
Average team ratings for each phase of the game.
Offense 29.1Defense 23.8Special teams 0.0
Explore national ratings →FBS opponents only
Record vs. other conferences
| Opponent conference | Record | Win % |
|---|---|---|
| American Athletic | 1–0 | 100.0% |
| Big 12 | 2–3 | 40.0% |
| Big Ten | 4–1 | 80.0% |
| Conference USA | 3–0 | 100.0% |
| Mid-American | 3–0 | 100.0% |
| Mountain West | 1–1 | 50.0% |
| SEC | 0–5 | 0.0% |
| Sun Belt | 3–0 | 100.0% |
Member strength
ACC teams
 Miami | 6–0 | 4–0 | 100.0% | #1 | 26.5 | #4 |
 Wake Forest | 6–1 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #14 | 15.4 | #16 |
 Louisville | 4–3 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 13.3 | #23 |
 SMU | 5–1 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 9.8 | #35 |
 Florida State | 3–4 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 9.6 | #36 |
 Pittsburgh | 5–2 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 9.2 | #37 |
 North Carolina | 4–2 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 8.7 | #41 |
 Duke | 4–2 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 7.8 | #44 |
 Virginia Tech | 5–2 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 6.6 | #47 |
 Clemson | 4–2 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 6.5 | #48 |
 Virginia | 4–3 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 5.6 | #50 |
 NC State | 3–3 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1.1 | #62 |
 Syracuse | 2–4 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 0.5 | #65 |
 Georgia Tech | 2–4 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 0.3 | #68 |
 Boston College | 3–3 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | -2.6 | #82 |
 California | 3–4 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | -3.9 | #88 |
 Stanford | 3–4 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | -11.4 | #108 |
Methodology
Only completed FBS-vs-FBS nonconference games count. Early-season result weight scales from zero to 30% across the first 10 games, with unused weight assigned to current team strength. Ranked-team share and opponent quality use the latest verified data.