Expectations30%
—← Hot Seat rankingsWhy he’s here
TA
SEC
Mike Elko
Texas A&M · 2–1 (0–1) · 3rd season at school
Hot Seat Score36Secure↑6 this week
0 · Secure100 · Hot Seat
Transparent inputs
Component breakdown
Trajectory20%
12Current Results15%
60Talent Utilization15%
53Big Games10%
40Fans10%
50What the verified inputs show
Texas A&M's measurable performance profile is not showing a dominant pressure factor in the current model. Strong program trajectory is reducing pressure.
Calculation audit
Why this score?
| Component | Raw metric | Score | Weight | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Expectations | Expected wins unavailable | — | 30% | — |
| Trajectory | Three-season weighted program trend | 12.3 | 20% | 3.7 |
| Current Results | 2–1 overall · 0–1 conference | 60.0 | 15% | 13.5 |
| Talent Utilization | 96th talent percentile vs 93th performance percentile · CORE | 52.6 | 15% | 11.8 |
| Big Games | Bad losses 35 · ranked opponents 50 | 39.5 | 10% | 5.9 |
| Fans | 0% Yes · 0 votes | 50.0 | 10% | 5.0 |
Objective weights are redistributed proportionally only when an objective component is unavailable. Fan polling remains exactly 10% and uses a neutral 50 until its response threshold is met.
Displayed score
Hot Seat History
Weekly fan poll
Is Mike Elko on the hot seat?
Fan polling represents 10% of the CFB Intel Hot Seat Index. It does not determine whether a coach loses his job.
Sign in to vote
0% Yes100% No0 votes
Poll awaiting minimum response threshold · 100 valid votes requiredFootball data: CollegeFootballData · Calculation: CFB Intel HOT_SEAT_V1_3 · Rankings and public labels use the final, context-adjusted score.